Superpower: AI, Pretti & Good in the

National Interest

German Version

Part 1

Why the cases of Alex Pretti and Renee Good as well as the Epstein files threaten global sovereignty – and what a realistic solution looks like. A personal assessment on ethical AI development, social integrity, and the protection of national power interests. The way nations today defend their national interest – be it Germany, India, or others – takes place away from saber-rattling at the border and focuses much more on the social level. In the context of my research on Operative Psychology, which represents an early form of the methodical militarization of the social sciences for the domestic sphere. Time and again I had to experience the circumstances that were the consistent continuation of exerting influence on societal functional positions. My personal impression is: The decisive battles were then, as they are today, first fought at home, not in the field, but increasingly in the everyday social space, which is becoming increasingly digital. Societal architectures in the context of these strategies were built during the Cold War. This is imperative because otherwise foreign methodical influences, like generic infiltrations via functional posts, were already attempted during the Cold War. Researching scientifically sound materials has the charm that the contents are designed to be particularly valid, so insights from such sources provide a good foundation for forming a personal overall picture. The modern foundation of AI has a very manipulative origin. According to the historical research of Yasha Levine, the main driver of the development, the vision of Artificial Intelligence, emerged during the Vietnam War. To manipulate the ideology of a simple person means to proactively act on a level of belief, across language barriers, to change the mind of a foreign person with an Asian culture towards Western values. Somehow the method of starving them out had not worked, where the militarily used herbicides as like Agent Orange destroyed entire harvests along with nature. So a somewhat more intelligent solution was needed. Let's just skip forward 50 years. Nowadays The now globally known phrase that foreigners eat dogs and cats represents only the crowning achievement of a new, successful AI-supported structure that apparently even appeals to stupid people. The dice are being rolled anew; through the use of autonomous AI assistants, as in Vibe Coding, missteps and development potential are collected in a practical manner. There is something like a digital Wild West with a gold rush mood. And countries like India desperately want to jump on this AI technology wave. And today it is actually the case that the language barrier is overcome as a matter of course by AI. The good news is that by overcoming the cultural barrier, the status quo of the respective culture can also be maintained for the purpose of influence. Because in the digital copy of the LLMs, the conditions are thus more stable to exert influence. They would therefore be more sustainable and manipulative, because one falls back on the existing wealth of experience, supported by the appropriate context. An LLM, so to speak the wealth of experience of an AI, speaks many international languages. The original vision was to capture every human being in their natural habitat during peacetime so that they can be manipulated in times of war. Practically, this means telling a joke beforehand so that the listener laughs breezily, only to shape them later under the fear of death. That would be a simplified explanation of the 4D method. Nothing less than first building trust, in order to later enforce it manipulatively. The invention of AI was successively built up with many intermediate steps over decades by DARPA. Most people do not know the intention behind the vision, with inventions and their developments, including the internet, mobile communications, GPS. But nobody can really ignore the old vision. Many inventions by well-meaning or simply naive nerds along this path were overtaken by the original military vision, and their neutral creations were infected with the old objective in the form of dual-use implementations, with force if necessary. the old the old Dual Use This is also not new; in Germany, for example, Autobahns serve as landing strips in the event of war. I will show later what sense Dual Use might have for control systems for doors and steering wheels. Dual Use is a methodical concept; it encompasses EU directives (e.g., Military Mobility 2.0) that already oblige member states to consider military applications in civilian planning, which are considered critical and are to be kept correspondingly secret. Therefore, this is not an ideal topic for public discussion. Speaking of which... A tangible example of this evolution is Social Media: What began for nerds as rating photos of fellow students developed into a global dating and contact platform. Today, these act as platforms, one of the most massive databases for state actors, because here breezy knowledge in the personal context of the individual stands in relation to their group. In doing so, an unofficial use of informal services, which Edward Snowden exposed in 2013, has now been officially legitimized (CLOUD Act: Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act). Currently, this pattern is repeating itself in the debate at Anthropic. Here, a deadline was actually set until Friday, February 27, 2026, as to whether and how their originally safety- and ethics-oriented AI will now be retroactively legitimized for military purposes and can now be officially used for or against the domestic population. There is a threat of forced militarization or a general state ban by the Department of Defense for the US. A development that finds comprehensible confirmation through reports on the use of AI in tactical operations, such as the raid on Nicolás Maduro and the attempted government takeover in Venezuela. It goes unnoticed that an increased coordinated abuse of power against the domestic population, as in the Pretti case involving Predictive Harassment and Gang-Stalking, is also mentioned in US reporting, because here more than just international law was broken. While at the national level India and China filed protests regarding the raid on Venezuela, the mass abuse of power is rather discussed as to whether it is Mass Hysteria, if one reads certain psychological journals on Notebook ML. That would be as if psychologists back then discussed among themselves whether it wasn't rather a delusion that millions of people were gassed, starved, or psychologically abused as in the GDR. In my opinion, this is the real reason why Anthropic is taking a stand against this. Because their service would be uncontrollably misused in police software with a kind of 4D method in such a way that international law is broken, involving crimes against humanity. I can imagine that this conflicts with the top-tier developers who opted for ethical AI development; instead of being poached by the competition, they consistently refused. And now it looks like exactly these contracts are going there: OpenAI. Good & Pretti If one therefore spans the thematic arc to current events, what at first glance reads like isolated, tragic incidents of police violence turns out, upon closer inspection, to be the consistent militarization of the social sciences – potentiated by Big Data and Artificial Intelligence to fulfill an old vision. This vision retains the purpose of total control for democracy. Find the mistake. The following events illustrate the radical nature of AI-supported state governance. They show why a blind spot in the self-perception of citizens and organizations poses not only a danger to the individual but also an existential threat to the national interest, because it endangers the preservation of one's own culture in the form of forced cultural assimilation by the employed instrument of power. (Comment by Gemini 2.5 Pro in this context on cultural assimilation) In the GDR, 'one's own culture' (e.g., bourgeois values, religious traditions, or non- conformist youth culture) was systematically replaced by an artificial, state- decreed 'socialist culture'. Whoever wanted to remain in the group had to adopt these new codes. One's own group thus became the executioner of the state's assimilation policy. In my opinion, it is important that the blind spot does not conceal the real abyss, but only provides space for the dream. US culture is a dream, not only of Americans but of the world, through Hollywood, but also of all US Internet Service providers. And this dream must be true so that people continue to dream, including the many aesthetically-minded naive developers, screenwriters, comedians as part of a satirical indictment. All of them together want to believe in this dream and that is the crucial thing, to pay for this dream with real dollars. That foreigners abroad want the same and pay for it, with subscriptions, investments, and engagement. They thus symbolically invested in a better world, a vision with this American dream. But the whole thing doesn't work if the nightmare comes true instead; then nobody wants to invest either. A Nightmare Came True To make this nightmare clearer for today's time with the role of modern IT services, I cite an application of the 'Operative Psychology' of the former GDR as a comparison. This method had already served the state as a covert instrument of power in the 80s, leading to the assimilation of one's own group. Operative Psychology was a kind of militarization of the social sciences for use against its own civilian population. According to my research in scientific treatises on the GDR, care was methodically taken within the ranks of the State Security (Stasi) to avoid the positive and empirical effects of self-knowledge in order to achieve the blind spot at the place of self-perception, especially among the students of Operative Psychology. I interpret this as a methodical breeding of systematic stupidity. It is for a system of arrogance of the leadership elite, having things perfectly under control, that needs no further civil servants with humanities foresight. Just like an AI tech fantasy, as if an Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) would take over and every human would be superfluous, just like their foresight. At this point, a quote from Bonhoeffer: Stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of the good than malice. One may protest against evil; it can be exposed and, if need be, prevented by use of force. Evil always carries within itself the germ of its own subversion... Against stupidity we are defenseless. Systematically Blind This intentionally blind spot was one of the main reasons for the GDR as a failed state; although they were aware that the effects of state power were self- damaging, they continued anyway. Operative Psychology is very well documented via the German state archive and has meanwhile been digitized, so that it can be differentiated from the capabilities of a modern AI. I also took my research on the GDR's lack of ability to reform from slightly dusty books from the Essen and Bochum university libraries. The knowledge about the context of Operative Psychology is well processed, is considered secure, and known to very few. Hmm. Note: The implication that the digital archive of the Stasi was actually transferred into an LLM for use with an AI is fictional. There is no proof of this! However, at the time of my private, purely academic research on Operative Psychology, which I undertook in my spare time. I did this to better understand the experiences of repression that I had personally had. At that time, I worked in the role of Key Account Manager, working for a company with digitization hardware and software development for manipulation-proof solutions based on modern microfilm. Unexpectedly, one of my Key Accounts with more than 10,000 employees in the company unexpectedly approached me. By chance, it was the commissioned service provider responsible for the actual restoration and archiving of the destroyed Stasi files. He pointed out to me that I had a security problem because I was not certified for security clearance. Therefore, he could not fully tell me the problem either. Instead, he talked to my managing director, who was also my direct supervisor. My employer informed me more or less promptly that I had an Indian passport, which had not been a problem until then, as I was generally excluded from military projects. However, it was not explained to me what this might have to do with my role as a Key Account Manager in many civilian digitization projects. Made in Germany for protection Version 4 / 02 March 2026 Made in Germany" Could Truly Stand for ProtectionMy satirical treatise in “Attack from Hidden Layer" is a purely fictional satirical piece. It is to be seen as a fictional thought experiment. The application of Operative Psychology allows for a deeper look into the cases of Good and Pretti, as well as inferring the circumstances and purposes. Because Operative Psychology was invented before the internet era, a clear methodological differentiation can be made here between technical capabilities and human effort. Thus, the "human" component can also be precisely separated and identified via its actions, distinct from the technical side. Consequently, the actions of the human component can be methodically isolated, which enables the unambiguous identification of the human actor through the analysis of these distinct behavioral patterns. Even using live data and big data, a cross-reference down to the individual level would be desirable—for example, for the prosecution of international war crimes—in order to enhance innovation potential in the national interest. The fact that the blind spot could be resolved, so to speak, is due to the fact that this new technical side did not exist during the GDR era. Through the deployment of stupid people or people acting stupidly, action and deed can now be perfectly separated. On this basis, knowledge "MADE IN Germany", conserved at the German Federal Archives, would not only be useful for protecting the German population, but could also serve as a methodological approach for the world regarding ethical AI development. German development could thus fully concentrate on its capabilities, instead of being branded as the evil one once again. Note: This would be for the integrity of the system and the preservation of power, and as a prerequisite for new, authentic training data for the next generations of LLMs/AI. Through a reappraisal, an improvement in data integrity could be achieved as a better technical foundation for AI innovation in the national interest. Furthermore, it would form an attractive differentiation that paves the way for an authentic international brain gain. Emerging countries like India, with a culturally rooted, holistic humanistic tradition, could thus gain the motivation of top international developers to whom income is secondary. Speaking of which...The same effect of a difference analysis also occurs if a civilian-used and trained LLM is distilled shortly before a military application, and the change is compared after militarization—even if it is a different militarized LLM, because the status quo in the world is independent of the model. Thus, the reported attacks on Anthropic shortly before the expiration of the Department of Defense's ultimatum appear in a very special light. Here, three different Chinese LLMs are said to have been trained via millions of systematized accesses, according to information from Anthropic itself! In this context, according to the press, the top developers have refused to work for another company despite the highest salary offers. What if… Would an AI use the knowledge of Operative Psychology? It acts like a catalyst when transferred into an LLM and now anyone, regardless of prior knowledge, can act as if they had studied it, and the targeted personnel selection turns out accordingly, if acting humans could use this knowledge situatively stupidly. Stupid people are ideal for this. As an example, I can name myself; thus I can write from the full context of the Cold War, despite my knowledge gaps. An AI can supplement missing knowledge contexts, even to the detriment of humans. A degree methodically helps to provide a holistic view of a knowledge context, which also includes knowledge and experiences that remain hidden to oneself. Although an AI can compensate here, it also only reflects the interest and the context, not necessarily the areas that might be unsympathetic to the user or even entire organizations. That is then a kind of co-dependency and captivity in an information bubble. A modern AI is more like a drug dealer who always makes sure that the "customer- appropriate" drug of attention is fulfilled by letting the body's own dopamine work nicely in abundance. Suddenly, election campaigns are more like a kind of junkie television. The theme headliners are strangely inflated, like on YT, and with the click on the video, the next shot of dopamine is produced. For the understanding of modern systematized violence and its destructive potential: The cases of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti. Renee Nicole Good On January 7, 2026, the 37-year-old poet and mother Renee Nicole Good was shot dead in her car by an ICE federal agent in Minneapolis. A few days earlier, ICE launched an aggressive raid against foreigners, 'Operation Metro Surge', characterized by paramilitary intimidation. The Good couple had just dropped their son off at school when they noticed an ICE raid. Renee Good had merely used a whistle to warn neighbors about the disproportionate action. The unarmed Renee Good was murdered with four shots. Subsequently, an even more unprecedented digital annihilation regarding the murdered Renee Good's reputation followed, only to systematically justify this act and cover up the true circumstances. The US Department of Justice rapidly declared the action as self-defense by the officers against a "domestic terrorist" – a framing that was massively pushed through government-friendly opinion channels as well as official digital channels. In the background, an unprecedented, AI-controlled machinery was set in motion against the deceased Renee Good. Within 48 hours, bot networks flooded the internet with fake criminal records and AI-manipulated still images of bodycam videos that made Renee Good's facial expression appear aggressive and insane. These bots automatically sifted through every news report and generated fakes that dominated the trends. For example, a single viral post reached millions of views before being deleted; subsequent corrections fizzled out into insignificance. Sledgehammers for Sparrows This case proves a systematic asymmetry: A defenseless individual faces an algorithmic superior power trained to execute maximum character assassination with deadly efficiency. On the other hand, a single person who does not even belong to the government can also do this with access to such means – as in the case of the Hyundai production facility in Georgia, where a local politician gave a false tip to ICE. The consequence of the military-style treatment of the Hyundai workers was billions in damages for the state and a far-reaching loss of international trust. It turned out to be merely an operational formal error with visas, under the pretext of which a xenophobic agenda was to be carried out. The Good case is not an exception; it is the systematized rule of a new power structure where the destruction of the individual is merely the collateral damage of a higher-level intimidation agenda of all those who have access to these instruments of power

Part 2

Superpower: AI, Pretti & Good´in the National Interest Version 4 / 02 March 2026 Note: There is no proof of a connection between the software used and the reported methods and the AI associated with it. Only a victim-specific opinion is reflected here, which has already been reproduced in American media. WARNING In the following part, purely fictional case studies for 4D applications are created, which serve only for the purpose of studying the method. In the case of psychological dispositions or illnesses, I strongly advise against reading this text, only under the supervision of professionally trained personnel and only for adults or under adult supervision! This text is not for the faint of heart! WARNING Systematic Repression: The Alex Pretti Case That a digital machinery can operate subtly and cruelly is shown by the case of Alex Pretti. Pretti, a nurse who had protested unarmed against the murder of Renee Good, was executed shortly thereafter by federal police. But the actual weapon directed against him was again digital in nature. According to American media, software is said to have been used, such as the 'ELITE' system developed by Palantir, to create not only dossiers but real-time movement profiles. According to American media, an AI is said to serve the software like Palantir. This means the manufacturer of the AI does not directly notice what and how an AI is used in the subsequent system. However, it is not hard to imagine that if an AI is not used for the intended purpose, conflicts arise that suddenly lead the manufacturer to ask uncomfortable questions. It is also conspicuous when major politics then intervenes, threatens with a ban, while the actual "perpetrator" remains conspicuously silent. AI-supported software is already gaining more and more entry into German police authorities, as the CCC reports at their conferences. They mention a form of dependence on investigation methods that increasingly rely on the familiar software. According to the CCC speakers, this means that even if a national in-house solution were developed and used for placement, the method would remain. Reports from American civil rights organizations document these methods. Accordingly, this is about "Social Engineering" and psychological repression, which are known as "Predictive Harassment" or "Gang Stalking". Relatives report that Alex Pretti suffered from the feeling of the omnipresence of the state in the days before his death. Civilian vehicles systematically appeared at his whereabouts; personal data was specifically used to give him the feeling of total surveillance. Anthropologist Sarah Brayne describes the symptoms of such technology-based repression as hypervigilance and data trauma. When algorithms mark every deviation from routine as suspicious and "Predictive Policing" leads to constant prejudgment, the individual withdraws into psychological isolation. However, the picture falls short of describing the completeness of the overall picture. The Invisible Weapon: Social Sciences in the AI Age The true extent, for example, goes beyond the comparison with Operative Psychology. Just as the internet, mobile communications, GPS, viewed individually, seem harmless, the actual intention is obscured, the underlying vision, the actual purpose of total military state leadership. This is especially true when a harmless application is communicated to the outside world, then it is Dual Use. While the GDR failed due to its own deception as a Failed State, the power potential of such manipulation revealed itself through the publication of "The Art of Deception", in the course of the Snowden Leaks. In this training slide of the British intelligence services, militarized social science applied civilianly is shown. This involves modern, Big Data-supported militarized social sciences. The training slide shows how specific phenotypes are systematically targeted, shows how personal as well as group-technical dynamics are manipulated, and frames it as "Magic". This can involve a general discrediting, by giving people who like to take on foreign topics and are particularly trapped in their information bubble, like well-known artists who now profit from Social Media. In this way, false information can easily be slipped to them, for example, about embryo-spiced chips, or chemtrails, or transcendental travel with yogic bouncing, flat earth, and much more. This makes sense in order to discredit a specific group directly or to prepare a group to optimize a prepared dismissive attitude, to reject something more strongly, or to distract from a truth as an application of misappropriated Predictive Policing. For example, Snowden-like psychological profiles of employees or independent contractors were identified after the scandal at the time, even though they never had anything to do with Snowden or had even leaked anything. As a precaution, they were fired en masse from American service. Here, on suspicion, like in Predictive Policing of a possible crime, the dismissal of people was initiated beforehand instead of better securing the documents. Accordingly, the reverse case is not illogical, to hire personnel in accordance with the militarized instruments of power, which also proceed with military, including lethal violence. What kind of people would laugh if they could look at photos of washed-up dead refugee babies in a WhatsApp chat? Militarization of Candid Camera In the following, for better understanding, I will explain from the fictional victim's perspective. Real case studies of Operative Psychology are possible, for example, in diploma theses and through research. The following examples are compatible, as they serve the essence of the same methods: Through the induction of chronic stress – which was cynically framed in the presentation as a "Magic Trick" – a particularly sustainable form of population policy arises. In one sentence, the trick is revealed, like in a situation of the television show "Candid Camera". Those who cannot imagine this should watch old episodes on YouTube. And this usually works like this: A victim to whom the prank is to be played is usually suggested by their peer group. The plans for a prank are created based on habits, and an artificial simulated event is created, often an absurd one, in which the victim falls into a trap. Everything is recorded with cameras. And there at the end, where the victim is usually very desperate, it is aborted, the prank is triggered and explained, which often ends with loud laughter, and often with a comforting hug with a feeling of relief. And this ending would be missing in a militarization; instead, the stress of the deception, which was induced as a magical "prank", remains. The people are disturbed, but they find no redemption. And this is repeated, and again and again. And this can very certainly lead to the triggering of depression, or a predisposed illness, purely through stress. And because this is intentional, this is torture, as the name of this modern form of Operative Psychology already reveals. If the victim is aware, the depression can easily lead to suicide, but it can be even worse: the slow, decomposing torture leading to death. 4D – Deny, Disrupt, Deceive, Degrade, Destroy What can systematically induced stress achieve? The goal: hypervigilance is the physiological disruption of the target person. Continuous chronic stress leads, according to medical standards (ICD-11, DSM-5), to severe illnesses up to death in the long term. To achieve this, it is enough to break everyday routines – the walk to the checkout, the ride on the train. All easy, actually carefree situations, even the anticipation of them. Simple situations, like buying ingredients for lunch, are disrupted by subtle, algorithmically controlled anomalies: Example 4D a) Do you know that feeling at the checkout when you pay with a card, that you are very careful for a second, even holding your hand over it when entering the PIN code? Suddenly an everyday-looking person stands next to you and tries to look over your shoulder. Oh, that can happen, right? So that you don't dismiss this as a coincidence, a similar incident is simply repeated over and over again at the checkout, when paying with the card, and a random person who falls short of the distance when paying; these can be different people in different supermarkets. The experienced unusualness of the situation leaves no doubt upon later reflection: This was clearly not a coincidence. What happens if my PIN now becomes known? What do such uninhibited people do when my PIN is known? Am I financially secure? It could be taken to the extreme if you now want to pick something up and part of the house number for the pickup contains part of the PIN number. A feeling of powerlessness, fear, and thus stress establishes itself. Or what is certainly funny: A pending rating would be submitted by you, although you didn't initiate it yourself at all, but normally this requires a PIN, which is sent as a one-time password via SMS. Example 4D b) Today's train systems can automatically perform AI-controlled occupancy management. The cameras coupled on board can not only determine the location, but an AI could also predict where you will sit – especially if the probable alternative seats are already occupied. With a picky person, this is very predictable in a full train. Let's assume you are sitting in the train composing a new melody or writing something creative. Creative people need the flow: Some seek seclusion, others like to sit in crowded places or at the window to be inspired. The flow can be very individual. Even for a non-creative person, it is conceivable that one has to concentrate intensely in this state and must be in an inner harmony. … until this is broken by subtle, algorithmically controlled anomalies: Someone sits next to you, although everything else is free. This is unusual in an empty train. Moreover, you notice that this person is trying to listen to your melody by taking off their own headphones and holding their head more like they are eavesdropping – normally the opposite is observed in the train. Even if one could read along, one rather doesn't do it. But conscious reading along, eavesdropping, the conscious breaking of habit, visibly! This triggers direct discomfort. It's about your creation; as an artist, you live off it (not necessarily only financially). But what if the melody is stolen and later it is claimed that you copied it? All this goes through your head. Or for the non-creative friends of this world. You take the train and just want your peace in the crowded train. You find one of the few empty seats, as if it had become free just for you, and then the seatmate asks you what time it is. Not a bad question, right? The only problem is that it is exactly the time as your PIN number! And now your head is spinning and you can't just get up because of it, but the proximity to a person who is potentially hostile to you is sitting next to you! This is certainly just a coincidence, you tell yourself, but there have simply been too many coincidences that day. And suddenly this person asks you how to find the connecting train right away. You now have to talk to this person, which triggers discomfort because you have to look the person in the eyes, be polite, friendly for the sake of politeness. Everything is difficult in this moment! Furthermore, when you step out of the train, the person follows you, which is extremely annoying. You are stressed. Pay less attention to traffic. Your actions become less considered and thus also more predictable. … until this is broken by subtle, algorithmically controlled anomalies: An electronic door in the tram opens on the wrong side, to the busy street side instead of the platform side. You were far away from this door, but how can that happen? You cross the street and a delivery vehicle drives very close past you. You already noticed it approaching. It's a force of habit, especially with petrol cars, to perceive the distance quite well by the engine noise. Regardless, your decision is taken away because the sidewalk in front of you is occupied by pedestrians, a small family. It is clear to you, yield to the weaker, so you cross the street immediately, but this sudden revving of the engine, that is top-down gas, i.e., maximum acceleration in a 30 km/h zone from a regular delivery driver. Yes, delivery drivers are under time pressure, but not in this 30 km/h zone, and why exactly when you are the only one crossing the street, visible from afar? The van drives very close past you. Instead of walking faster, you walk slower across the street. You are sad. Example 4D c) You sit with friends or family at the table and celebrate a birthday together. It is a beautiful day. Everyone makes an effort to treat you kindly. You are completely relaxed in this situation. Everything feels light, beautiful, and happy. … until again subtle, algorithmically controlled anomalies occur: One of your friends is wearing a piece of clothing that reminds you of severe trauma (e.g., a rape). You panic because you don't know if it is a coincidence. On the other hand, you cannot confront anyone just because a piece of clothing reminds you of something bad. That is also not a topic for a birthday. The lightness is gone. You now have to play theater and do justice to the others. You ponder the whole time whether it is a coincidence or not, because you want peace. Therefore, you hypocritically ask the friend what a great piece of clothing they are wearing! He or she reacts completely irritated because, quite objectively, it is a normal piece of clothing. Nothing special. Nevertheless, you want to get rid of the discomfort and specifically ask how it is that he or she is wearing exactly this. The answer is sobering because it is not unambiguous. But you cling to the hope that your friend is only wearing this piece of clothing because they were inspired from the outside to do so – through the influence of a foreign person who perhaps specifically recommended wearing exactly that. You search for an explanation so that trust can be restored, so that lightness returns, and so that the birthday becomes beautiful again… This last fictional example is intended to deliberately illustrate the possible influences from the victim's perspective. A trauma is characterized by the fact that the victim, after the original act of violence – regardless of whether physical or psychological, the mechanism of action is physiologically the same for rape and abuse. Both are traumatic. Thus it is very easy to be retraumatized if it is systematically targeted. Example 4D d) Imagine you were forced as a child to touch the hot stove; you smelled the burning flesh. Now it is simple: when you smell burning flesh, you think of the act of violence. Imagine a closely trusted relative has died, and someone would now intentionally make insulting jokes about the deceased. Using such an example, the retraumatization process is easiest to understand. All conceivable situations can offer real points of attack via the mechanism of action of retraumatization. Entirely without AI, such principles of action were already used in the GDR by Operative Psychology. This science had the goal of deception, that no violence was taking place, although the opposite was the case. The problem is that the situation here is so individual that it often cannot be understood by outsiders. Why should a piece of clothing or a smell or listening, a look be an attack? That seems ridiculous to others. However, it is absolutely not ridiculous if it is specifically intended to remind of trauma or trigger fear. At this moment, it does not matter whether the wearer is acting unknowingly or not. For outsiders, the victim's reaction is incomprehensible. On the other hand, this reveals the countless points of attack methodically available to AI-supported technology – exactly according to the 4D principle: Deny, Disrupt, Deceive, Degrade, Destroy. The goal is invisible violence designed to permanently traumatize, even to the point of death. And that is why it is ideal to use stupid people or people who are willing to do stupid things. And exactly these people would laugh when they see a dead washed-up baby. I hope the question could be answered. Summary These artificially generated traumas lead to a generalization of fear. The non- assistance of society in staged near-accidents destroys trust in authorities and fellow human beings. Like a war veteran, the target person is retraumatized by everyday stimuli. If this systematic approach becomes omnipresent, it resembles a social atomic bomb. In the next version, I will now show the problem / the implications. .